Skip to main content
Glama
asarlashmit

MCP-Connect — Kali Agent MCP v2

by asarlashmit
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP-Connect — Kali Agent MCP v2

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Kali MCP Server

      magichrist
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Production-grade MCP server that exposes Kali Linux penetration testing tools to AI agents, enabling automated reconnaissance, web application testing, vulnerability assessment, and more.
      -

    • Kali MCP

      JoelSoliz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Config-driven MCP server that exposes Kali Linux penetration testing tools to AI agents, with automatic tool discovery, man page integration, and local/remote execution modes.
      MIT

    • redteam-mcp

      samirjani03
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A penetration testing MCP server that runs 20 hacking tools inside a Kali Linux Docker container, enabling AI assistants to execute security scans and attacks via natural language.
      2
      -

    • Shared Credit Tool

      Minglink
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local MCP server enabling Codex and ChatGPT to read/write files, execute commands, manage processes, use Git, and inspect images on the user's machine with full privileges.
      Apache 2.0

    • kali-mcp-server

      rangta10
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Kali Linux MCP server that integrates network security and penetration testing tools like Nmap, Whois, Dig, Ping, Nikto, Hydra, and SQLMap into a Dockerized environment for use with LLMs.
      12 npm
      3
      -
    Deploy Server
    Give agents eyes on the webHosted screenshot MCP. Send a URL, get a pixel-perfect image. $0.002 per grab. Works with Claude, Cursor, and Codex.grabbit.liveAd

    TDQS

    C2/5.0

    Scored across 126 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools are well-differentiated by domain prefixes (browser_, docker_, git_, etc.), but exec_command and execute_command are nearly identical, causing confusion. Also, some tools like find_entrypoints and find_tests could overlap with search_text, though descriptions help.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., create_directory, list_directory). Minor inconsistencies exist, such as browser_console (noun) instead of get_console, but overall the naming is reasonably predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    126 tools is excessive for any server. While it aims to cover a broad security toolkit, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., a single run_security_tool with options). The sheer number overwhelms the agent's ability to select appropriately.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set is extremely comprehensive, covering files, git, Docker, browser automation, process management, services, and a wide range of security scanners. However, there are minor gaps (e.g., no tool for chaining commands or updating scan configurations).

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources