qui_torrent_creator

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the HTTP methods (POST, DELETE, GET) which imply side effects, but it doesn't state whether operations are destructive, require authentication, or have rate limits. The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond the endpoints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the key usage pattern, followed by a clear list of operations. Each line is informative, though the list format is a bit dense but acceptable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema and a moderate number of operations, but the description doesn't explain return values or error handling. It covers the operation list and argument passing, but lacks details on prerequisites or side effects, making it adequate but not complete for a multi-operation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the parameters beyond the generic 'arguments' object. It mentions path variables, query values, and body, but doesn't detail what each operation expects (e.g., instanceID, taskID). The description fails to compensate for the lack of schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool performs 'qui torrent creator operations' and lists four specific operations with their HTTP endpoints. It distinguishes from siblings by naming the resource (torrent-creator) and the operations, though it doesn't explicitly contrast with sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains how to pass arguments (path variables, query params, body) and lists the operations, which implies when to use each. However, it doesn't provide explicit guidance on when to choose this tool over alternatives or when not to use it, leaving usage context implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.