kreta_lazar_ervin_events

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The only behavioral claim is 'lekérése' (retrieval), which adds nothing beyond the readOnlyHint and idempotentHint annotations. It does not disclose pagination, filtering behavior, or the meaning of the optional child parameter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short Hungarian sentence with no filler. The resource and action are front-loaded, making it easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only retrieval with annotations and an output schema, the core purpose is clear. However, the ambiguous child parameter and lack of any usage guidance leave meaningful gaps for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain either parameter. The names and defaults give some hint (limit=100 is fairly clear), but child is ambiguous and is not clarified anywhere.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

A description specific verb+resource: 'lekérése' (retrieval) and 'előadások' (events/performances) of the Lázár Ervin Program. It is clearly distinct from all listed siblings, none of which target this program.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when Lázár Ervin Program events are needed, but it gives no explicit when-to-use guidance, exclusions, or comparison with alternative tools. It remains at the 'implied usage' level.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.