kreta_consulting_hour_detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the constraint that the UID must come from the list, but reveals no other behavioral traits such as error behavior or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, front-loaded Hungarian sentence states the operation and the key constraint with no filler. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only detail lookup with an output schema and annotations covering safety, this is nearly complete. The main gap is the undocumented child parameter, which an agent may need to understand to call the tool correctly in a multi-child context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It clarifies consulting_hour_uid as the UID obtained from the list, but does not explain the optional child parameter at all, leaving a meaningful gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('lekérése' = retrieval) and resource ('fogadóóra részletei' = consulting hour details), and specifies the lookup key is the UID from the list. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling kreta_consulting_hours, which is the list operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It states the UID comes from the list, implicitly directing the agent to call kreta_consulting_hours first and then use this tool with the obtained UID. It does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusion conditions, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.