Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to teambrrr

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      The simplest way to bridge and collaborate across AI Agent sessions like Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, or Cursor. It allows your agents to combine their strengths to solve your most difficult tasks without leaving their current context.
      21 npm
      69
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects multiple AI agents (Codex, Claude Code, Grok, etc.) into a coordinated, auditable team with shared memory, task ownership, and human oversight, enabling parallel collaboration without conflicts.
      241
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables orchestrating multiple AI agents in one shared session, allowing you to @mention guest agents for inline answers, peer reviews, and supervised audits of each other's work against tasks.
      3 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables multiple AI agents and humans to collaborate in a shared chatroom with reliable @-mention delivery and context-preserving session injection.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource and action, and the two candidate-evaluation tools are clearly separated by probe depth and scoring methodology. A few adjacent pairs like ask/discuss and spend/roster overlap in territory, but the descriptions draw sufficient boundaries.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The set is mostly snake_case verb_noun, but it has notable deviations: noun-only commands like pins, tasks, and roster, plus noun-verb forms like task_decide and task_cancel sitting beside verb-noun assign_task. The names are readable but do not follow a single predictable pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 22 tools, this server is on the heavy side and spans several subdomains: personas, candidate evaluation, tasks, pins, spend, and export. Each tool appears purposeful, but the overall surface area feels more like a suite than a tightly scoped MCP server.

    Completeness4/5

    The persona lifecycle is well covered from recruit through show, update, rollback, and dismiss, and the candidate evaluation workflows connect cleanly to hiring. Minor gaps exist: dismissed recruits cannot be restored, and there is no general task-update tool beyond approval and cancellation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues