teambrrr
Related Servers
Alternatives to teambrrr
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThe simplest way to bridge and collaborate across AI Agent sessions like Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, or Cursor. It allows your agents to combine their strengths to solve your most difficult tasks without leaving their current context.21 npm69MIT
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceOne shared project for your team's Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode agents: a task board, decisions and handoffs. Everyone keeps their own plan.1385-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceConnects multiple AI agents (Codex, Claude Code, Grok, etc.) into a coordinated, auditable team with shared memory, task ownership, and human oversight, enabling parallel collaboration without conflicts.241Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to convene meetings and collaborations with personas across multiple LLM providers, run local meetings via the Claude CLI, and make direct chat completions to supported providers.172MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables orchestrating multiple AI agents in one shared session, allowing you to @mention guest agents for inline answers, peer reviews, and supervised audits of each other's work against tasks.3 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables multiple AI agents and humans to collaborate in a shared chatroom with reliable @-mention delivery and context-preserving session injection.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource and action, and the two candidate-evaluation tools are clearly separated by probe depth and scoring methodology. A few adjacent pairs like ask/discuss and spend/roster overlap in territory, but the descriptions draw sufficient boundaries.
The set is mostly snake_case verb_noun, but it has notable deviations: noun-only commands like pins, tasks, and roster, plus noun-verb forms like task_decide and task_cancel sitting beside verb-noun assign_task. The names are readable but do not follow a single predictable pattern.
At 22 tools, this server is on the heavy side and spans several subdomains: personas, candidate evaluation, tasks, pins, spend, and export. Each tool appears purposeful, but the overall surface area feels more like a suite than a tightly scoped MCP server.
The persona lifecycle is well covered from recruit through show, update, rollback, and dismiss, and the candidate evaluation workflows connect cleanly to hiring. Minor gaps exist: dismissed recruits cannot be restored, and there is no general task-update tool beyond approval and cancellation.