777 Forge · Execute Gate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true. Description adds that mutation only occurs after judge SEAL and lease/chain IDs, and mentions modes. However, terms like '888_HOLD without SEAL' are undefined, reducing clarity.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but dense with jargon. It attempts to be concise but sacrifices clarity. Key information is present but poorly structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description does not explain what the tool returns or how parameters like 'seal_verdict_id' or 'approved_action_hash' relate to the judge workflow. Given the complexity (15 params, destructive behavior, sibling tools), the description is insufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds very little about the 15 parameters. Only 'mode' enum values are mentioned in passing. This is insufficient for an agent to correctly use the tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses cryptic jargon like 'KERNEL 777', 'A-FORGE', and '888_HOLD' without plain-language explanation. It vaguely indicates it's an execution gate requiring judge seal, but the core purpose is unclear for an AI agent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides some guidance: skip without judge SEAL or while still planning (arif_think). However, it doesn't explicitly state when to use this tool vs siblings like arif_judge or arif_think, leaving ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.