Skip to main content
Glama
ariffazil

arifOS MCP Server

by ariffazil

Related Servers

Alternatives to arifOS MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Constitutional MCP server enforcing 13 Floors of governance for AI agents, providing tools for session anchoring, reasoning, safety critique, and audit logging.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Governance framework for LLM agents. Exposes seven mechanically-enforced rules plus tools for preflight file protection, audit-chain verification, session handoff and worklog templates, MCP config auditing, and an emergency kill switch.
      12
      36 npm
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Universal governance layer for AI agents — MCP-native, fail-closed, LNN interpretability. Governed receipts, IPFS audit proofs, and rollback for any agent in any framework.
      3
      39 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct and clearly defined purpose within the kernel's lifecycle: from session initiation (arif_init) through observation, reasoning, ethical critique, judgment, sealing, composition, execution, and memory management. The only potential overlap between arif_route and arif_bridge_connect is explicitly resolved by preferring arif_route. All other tools are uniquely scoped with no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools follow the 'arif_<verb>' pattern, with most verbs being single words (e.g., compose, judge, seal). The sole exception is 'arif_bridge_connect', which uses a compound verb. This minor inconsistency slightly detracts from the overall uniformity, but the pattern is otherwise consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 11 tools, arifOS covers the full gamut of operations for a sophisticated governance kernel without being excessive. Each tool serves a clear and necessary role in the agent's workflow, from initialization to immutable sealing. The count feels well-scoped for the intended domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the major stages of the decision and execution pipeline: init, observe, think, critique, judge, seal, compose, forge, memory, route, and bridge. This provides a cohesive workflow. Missing are utility tools like listing or unsealing, but these are not central to the core lifecycle, so the gap is minor.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessWithin a week