A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables searching for users, fetching papers, and exporting research data from OpenReview conferences like ICML, ICLR, NeurIPS.
12
MIT
studizba-mcp
by ari3lYT
Related Servers
Alternatives to studizba-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceExposes course documents as searchable resources and provides tools for reading, study task management, and source-grounded quiz prompts. Supports hybrid retrieval and integration with DeepSeek-based agents.51-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to query SeoulTech e-Class course announcements and assignments, search full notice text, track pending work, and refresh login sessions securely through natural language.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides read-only access to StudyLife data including courses, notes, sessions, and learning goals, enabling MCP clients to query study information via natural language.7AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides tools for querying student academic data such as subjects, marks, performance reports, timetable, exams, fees, events, holidays, and assignments via natural language.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Mashov school management system API, allowing retrieval of grades, schedule, messages, and more through natural language.3MIT
TDQS
C2.7/5.0
Scored across 18 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Most tools are clearly separated by search/get/compare/rank intent, but get_progress and get_monitoring_status overlap heavily on crawl and queue status, and get_teacher_profile vs get_teacher_analytics both surface metrics. The descriptions help resolve ambiguity, but a few tool boundaries are fuzzy.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tool names follow a lowercase snake_case verb_noun pattern, which is predictable and consistent. Minor inconsistencies exist: some names omit the entity type (e.g., explain_score, get_progress, refresh_entity) and get_rating_history is less scoped than sibling tools, but the overall convention is solid.
Tool Count3/5
With 18 tools, the server sits in the 16–25 range that feels heavy for the purpose. The set is not bloated beyond justification, but several monitoring and comparison tools could potentially be consolidated.
Completeness3/5
Teacher-level workflows are well covered: search, profile, reviews, analytics, explain, compare, rank, and refresh. However, department-level coverage is thinner—there is no department profile/details tool or direct way to list teachers in a department—so some workflows may hit dead ends.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues