Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to studizba-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables investigating Steam games through player-written reviews, rating history, patch notes, and gaming press articles, with review filtering by sentiment, time, and playtime.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language, read-only access to a user's own learning-management account for courses, assignments and deadlines, lecture attendance, notices, grades, and syllabus evidence, including reading page/slide/cell locations inside PDF, Office, HWP/HWPX, HTML, and ZIP attachments. Runs locally over stdio or remotely over OAuth-protected Streamable HTTP for desktop and mobile clients, and can compare changes against a locally encrypted baseline.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables personalized Steam game discovery by ranking the store against a player's playtime history and stated preferences, with tools to search games, inspect details and reviews, and explore taste profiles.
      10
      23 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are clearly separated by search/get/compare/rank intent, but get_progress and get_monitoring_status overlap heavily on crawl and queue status, and get_teacher_profile vs get_teacher_analytics both surface metrics. The descriptions help resolve ambiguity, but a few tool boundaries are fuzzy.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names follow a lowercase snake_case verb_noun pattern, which is predictable and consistent. Minor inconsistencies exist: some names omit the entity type (e.g., explain_score, get_progress, refresh_entity) and get_rating_history is less scoped than sibling tools, but the overall convention is solid.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 18 tools, the server sits in the 16–25 range that feels heavy for the purpose. The set is not bloated beyond justification, but several monitoring and comparison tools could potentially be consolidated.

    Completeness3/5

    Teacher-level workflows are well covered: search, profile, reviews, analytics, explain, compare, rank, and refresh. However, department-level coverage is thinner—there is no department profile/details tool or direct way to list teachers in a department—so some workflows may hit dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues