unsilence_alert
Unsilence a silenced alert to resume notifications for critical issues.
Instructions
Unmute a currently silenced alert.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| alertId | Yes | Target alert ID |
Unsilence a silenced alert to resume notifications for critical issues.
Unmute a currently silenced alert.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| alertId | Yes | Target alert ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It states the tool reverses a silenced state, but does not disclose permissions, side effects, or behavior if the alert is not silenced. Adequate but not comprehensive.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single efficient sentence with no redundant information. It is front-loaded and concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers the core action adequately. However, it lacks context on post-unmuting behavior (e.g., notifications, state change effects).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema covers the single parameter 'alertId' with a description. The description does not add additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (unmute) and resource (silenced alert). It distinguishes from siblings like 'silence_alert' and 'acknowledge_alert' by using specific verb and context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as 'silence_alert' or 'acknowledge_alert'. It does not provide prerequisites (e.g., alert must be silenced) or when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/argosvix/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server