Skip to main content
Glama

request_approval

Create an approval request that forces human authorization before dangerous operations such as deletions or transfers. The account owner receives email notification for approval via dashboard or link.

Instructions

Create an approval request in the human approval gate (runtime control plane Phase 3; Pro+ only). Call it before dangerous operations (deletion / money transfer / account closure etc.); the account owner gets an email notification and a human approves or denies via the dashboard or the email link. Important: no MCP tool exists to approve or deny (an AI agent cannot self-approve its own request). Poll the result with get_approval. Expiry after timeoutSeconds (default 3600) counts as denied. Server-side consumption: passing approvalId to a dangerous mutation tool (bulk_delete_calls / purge_expired_plaintext / retry_failed_webhook / auto_silence_noisy_alert / extend_customer_trial / apply_promo_code_to_customer) makes the backend verify action match + approved + within expiry + unconsumed, and consume it on execution (1 approval = 1 execution). In that case create the request with an action exactly matching the target tool name. Example phrasing: "deleting user usr_123 is a dangerous operation — get human approval first"

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
actionYesOperation identifier (1-128 chars; alphanumerics, ._:-, and spaces). E.g. delete_user
summaryYesOne-line human-readable description (1-500 chars; appears verbatim in the approval email)
metadataNoSupplementary JSON object (up to 4KB, optional)
timeoutSecondsNoApproval deadline in seconds (60-86400, default 3600)
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Discloses creation of request, human approval via email/dashboard, timeout expiry counted as denied, server-side consumption with specific mutation tools, action matching, and one-time use. Fully transparent about side effects and constraints.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with purpose, usage example, key notes, and consumption details. Every sentence is informative, though slightly lengthy. Front-loaded with core action and context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a complex tool with 4 params, nested objects, and no output schema, the description is remarkably complete. Covers workflow, expiration, consumption, action matching, and dependencies. Leaves no critical gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, but description adds significant value: explains action should match target tool name for automatic consumption, summary appears verbatim in email, timeoutSeconds default 3600, and metadata usage. This extra context goes beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Create an approval request in the human approval gate' with context (Phase 3, Pro+ only) and examples. Distinguishes from siblings by mentioning polling with get_approval and listing dangerous operations that require it.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Call it before dangerous operations' and lists examples. Warns that no MCP tool exists for self-approval and instructs to poll with get_approval. Provides clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/argosvix/mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server