fire_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It only says 'Start playing a clip' without stating what happens if the clip is already playing, whether it resets the position, or if it triggers automation. Side effects are completely opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise with a single sentence for purpose and a structured parameter list. Every word is necessary; no filler. Front-loaded with the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 integer parameters) and presence of an output schema, the description is minimally complete. However, it omits behavioral context like idempotency, state transitions, or error conditions, which would be helpful for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema description coverage, the description explains both parameters ('track_index' and 'clip_index') with brief role statements ('the index of the track containing the clip'). This adds meaning beyond the schema's titles, though it could specify indexing start (0 or 1).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Start playing a clip') with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'stop_clip' and 'create_clip' by implying playback control, though it doesn't explicitly differentiate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'stop_clip' or 'start_playback'. It lacks context on prerequisites (e.g., clip must exist) or conditions (e.g., track must be armed).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.