create_audio_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses the creation action, required file import, version constraints, and slot emptiness precondition. However, it does not mention error handling or side effects beyond the preconditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a clear structure: purpose statement, version requirement, then parameter list. No redundant information, but could be slightly more organized with bullet points.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity, three parameters, and existence of output schema, the description covers purpose, preconditions, and parameter semantics. It omits error scenarios but is otherwise complete for agent action selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but description adds meaning for each parameter: 'track_index' is explained as index of audio track, 'clip_index' as slot index, 'path' as absolute path to supported audio file. This compensates for the schema gap, though file type examples are limited.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a new audio clip in an audio track's clip slot by importing a file. This is a specific verb+resource combination that distinguishes it from siblings like 'create_clip' or 'fire_clip'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides version requirements (Ableton Live 12.0.5+) and preconditions (track must be audio, slot must be empty) but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create_clip' or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.