Skip to main content
Glama
antonpinchuk

mobile-mcp-opengl

by antonpinchuk

Related Servers

Alternatives to mobile-mcp-opengl

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control Android devices and emulators through direct UI interaction, allowing app navigation, automated testing, and real-world task execution via ADB without computer vision or scripts.
      18
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A lightweight bridge enabling AI agents to perform real-world tasks on Android devices such as app navigation, UI interaction, and automated QA testing without requiring computer-vision pipelines or preprogrammed scripts.
      14
      1,166 PyPI
      848
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to fully control Android devices through over 30 tools for app management, UI automation, and vision-based analysis via ADB. It supports multi-device management, action recording, and smart execution strategies ranging from UI hierarchy parsing to coordinate-based interaction.
      37
      123 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: screenshot_ask is passive state-checking, while tap/swipe/long_press_and_ask each combine a specific gesture with screenshot-and-ask. record_and_ask targets animations, type_text and press_key are direct input without vision, logcat_grep handles logs, and vision_spend_report tracks cost. No two tools overlap in function.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern, with a clear <action>_and_ask convention for vision-verifying interactions and simple verb_noun for the rest. The naming logically separates gesture tools from non-vision tools, making the set easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well-scoped for a mobile automation/verification server. Each tool addresses a concrete need—actions, verification, logging, cost monitoring—and none feel redundant or purely decorative. The count fits the domain without bloat or sparsity.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full cycle of mobile UI interaction and verification: direct input (type_text, press_key), gestures (tap/swipe/long_press), visual state checking (screenshot_ask, record_and_ask), log inspection (logcat_grep), and cost governance (vision_spend_report). No obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues