Skip to main content
Glama
anshulbehl

AAP MCP Server

by anshulbehl
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to AAP MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Ansible Server

      bsahane
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive Ansible automation management through natural language, including playbook creation and execution, inventory management, role scaffolding, and project workflows. Supports both local inventories and full project lifecycle management with syntax validation and idempotency testing.
      30
      -

    • Open Automation Platform MCP

      joenukem
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes open automation platform capabilities to AI agents with tools for managing job templates, inventories, collections, EDA activations, audit events, and policy checks, governed by gateway auth, RBAC, and policy enforcement.
      7
      -

    • Ludus FastMCP

      tjnull
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered management of Ludus cyber range environments through natural language commands. Provides 157 tools for range lifecycle management, scenario deployment, template creation, Ansible role management, and SIEM integration for security testing and research.
      100
      86
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tool set shows significant functional overlap, particularly between gateway-specific tools (e.g., gateway_auth_management, gateway_service_management) and their generic counterparts (gateway_generic_api, generic_aap_api), which could confuse agents about when to use specialized vs. generic tools. However, descriptions help clarify distinct scopes within overlapping domains like management vs. direct API access.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with descriptive names (e.g., credential_management, inventory_host_management), but there are minor deviations like create_workflow_survey (verb-first) versus others (noun-first). Overall, the naming is predictable and readable across the set.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 18 tools, the count is borderline high for a single server, suggesting potential fragmentation. While it covers a broad domain (AAP management), some tools could be consolidated (e.g., overlapping gateway tools), making the set feel slightly heavy but still manageable.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set comprehensively covers the AAP management domain, including CRUD operations for credentials, inventories, jobs, templates, users, and more, plus advanced features like analytics and bulk operations. No obvious gaps exist; agents can handle full lifecycle workflows without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources