agileconfig_list_users

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description accurately describes a read-only list operation but does not disclose authentication requirements, potential pagination, or performance implications for large datasets. Adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single, clear sentence in natural language. No wasted words. Front-loaded with the main action and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters and no output schema, the description adequately explains the return fields. Could mention if results are sorted or paginated, but not essential for a simple list tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist. Baseline is 4 since schema coverage is 100% and description does not need to add parameter details. However, it does not explicitly note the absence of parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action (获取/Get), resource (所有用户的列表/list of all users), and included fields (用户名、角色、状态、团队). Distinguishes from sibling 'agileconfig_get_user' which retrieves a single user.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'agileconfig_get_user' or 'agileconfig_create_user'. Does not mention prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.