agileconfig_get_user
Retrieve detailed user information by providing the user ID.
Instructions
根据用户 ID 获取单个用户的详细信息。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 用户 ID |
Retrieve detailed user information by providing the user ID.
根据用户 ID 获取单个用户的详细信息。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 用户 ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Only states it gets details; no mention of read-only nature, auth requirements, error handling, or return format. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, efficient, front-loaded. Slightly more detail on return value would improve, but no waste.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with one parameter; description adequate but lacks output details (no output schema). Could mention what 'detailed information' includes.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%; parameter 'id' described as 'user ID'. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema. Baseline 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states 'get detailed information of a single user based on user ID'. Distinguishes from siblings like list_users (multiple users) and create/update/delete users.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage: when you have a specific user ID and need details. But no explicit guidance on when to use this vs alternatives (e.g., list_users for all users, get_user_permissions for permissions).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/animacaeli/agile-confg-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server