get_request_history
Retrieve past execution records of an API request to track responses and performance.
Instructions
Get the execution history of a specific request
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| requestId | Yes | ID of the request |
Retrieve past execution records of an API request to track responses and performance.
Get the execution history of a specific request
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| requestId | Yes | ID of the request |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description carries full burden. It only implies a read operation but does not disclose permissions, rate limits, or the nature of the execution history.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence), which is concise, but it sacrifices necessary detail, making it only moderately effective.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is incomplete; it does not explain what the execution history contains, whether it is paginated, or any limitations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides for the parameter 'requestId'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'execution history of a specific request', distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'get_request' and 'get_stats'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_request' or 'get_stats'. No when-not or context information is given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/anggasct/mcp-insomnia'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server