Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
MCP-Insomnia

MCP-Insomnia

by anggasct
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

get_insomnia_collection

Fetch a complete Insomnia collection using the workspace ID. Returns the full API structure including requests, environments, and folders.

Instructions

Get a complete collection from Insomnia app by workspace ID

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "workspaceId": "<workspaceId>"
    },
    "name": "get_insomnia_collection"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
workspaceIdYesInsomnia workspace ID (starts with wrk_)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv0.5.2
  2. Removedv0.3.0
  3. First observedv0.4.0

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states 'Get' but does not disclose idempotency, potential side effects, permissions, or what 'complete collection' entails in terms of data returned.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with action and resource. No unnecessary words. Efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given low complexity and one parameter, the description is minimally complete. It lacks details about output structure (no output schema), use cases, or how it differs from 27 sibling tools. Adequate but needs more context for full utility.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of parameters, so baseline is 3. The description adds 'complete collection' but does not clarify what makes it complete versus other collection endpoints. The parameter description is clear but not enhanced beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Get', the resource 'complete collection', and the qualifier 'from Insomnia app by workspace ID'. It distinguishes from siblings like 'list_collections' which lists multiple, and 'get_collection_detail' which may return less detail.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of use cases, prerequisites, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer from context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools