Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-freshservice

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that provides 159 tools for interacting with the Freshservice ITSM platform, covering modules such as tickets, assets, and project management. It enables users to manage service desk operations and configuration through the Model Context Protocol.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that connects AI assistants to Freshservice Service Desk for ticket triage, asset analysis, and support history summarization.
      23
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with Freshservice service desk, supporting ticket search, retrieval, and creation via a configurable, Docker-first deployment.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a standard MCP interface for Freshdesk helpdesk operations, including ticket lifecycle management, draft/send replies and notes, contact lookup, and agent/group discovery.
      14
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 76 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are separated by resource and action (agent vs requester vs ticket vs solution), and descriptions clarify list/search/get variants. A few boundaries are fuzzy—e.g. create_group is an agent group while requester groups are explicitly prefixed, and solution folder/article listing uses several get/list patterns—but tools are not broadly indistinguishable.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Names are all snake_case and generally verb_noun, but the verb vocabulary is inconsistent: get_all_agents vs list_roles vs filter_agents, get_list_of_solution_folder vs list_solution_subfolders, and singular get_all_solution_category. The pattern is readable but not predictable enough for a top score.

    Tool Count1/5

    76 tools is far beyond the 3–15 well-scoped range and exceeds the 50+ extreme-mismatch threshold. Even for a broad ITSM product, this surface should be split or namespaced into smaller MCP servers.

    Completeness4/5

    Core service-desk resources have strong lifecycle coverage: tickets (create/update/delete/restore, conversations, time entries), agents/requesters (create/update/deactivate/reactivate), groups (CRUD), and knowledge base (CRUD/search/publish). Gaps remain around admin CRUD for service catalog items and broader ITSM modules such as changes, problems, and assets, but the apparent service-desk scope is largely covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues