dung_nha_tu_dxf

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations, so the description carries the full burden. It implies scene mutation (building walls and columns) but never states whether existing geometry is overwritten, whether a Blender connection is required, or what units/scene state results. Key behavioral facts are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the action, followed by role and prerequisite. No filler, though it could be tighter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A complex 9-parameter mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema needs far more behavioral and parameter detail than provided. Layer selection, scale, and height semantics are all left for the agent to guess.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Nine parameters with 0% schema description coverage, and the description explains none of them. Critical inputs like duong_dan (required), ty_le (scale), cao_tuong, layer_cot/layer_tuong, and dung_cot_luon are left entirely undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: reads a DXF floor plan and builds walls ('tuong') and columns ('cot') in Blender. The 'from DXF' scope also distinguishes it from sibling builders like dung_tuong and dung_cot, though it does not name those explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent to call doc_mat_bang_dxf first to verify the data before invoking this tool, and frames the tool as the 2D-to-3D bridging step. Clear sequencing context, but no when-not guidance or discussion of alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.