images_delete
Delete an image asset from your Tencent Ads account by providing the account ID and image ID.
Instructions
删除图片素材 (Delete image)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| image_id | Yes | 图片ID | |
| account_id | Yes | 广告主账户ID |
Delete an image asset from your Tencent Ads account by providing the account ID and image ID.
删除图片素材 (Delete image)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| image_id | Yes | 图片ID | |
| account_id | Yes | 广告主账户ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only says 'Delete image'. No disclosure of whether deletion is permanent, what happens to associated data, or access requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short, but appropriately front-loaded. However, it sacrifices completeness for brevity, earning a middling score.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a delete operation with no output schema, the description lacks important context about the impact of deletion, confirmation steps, or error scenarios.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states '删除图片素材 (Delete image)', clearly indicating the action (delete) and resource (image). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like videos_delete or adgroups_delete.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of prerequisites, side effects, or conditions for deletion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/andyleimc-source/tencent-ad-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server