Skip to main content
Glama
andr3medeiros

PDF Manipulation MCP Server

by andr3medeiros
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to PDF Manipulation MCP Server

Related Servers

  • PDF MCP

    gzigurella
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables PDF processing and analysis including text extraction, metadata retrieval, search, page manipulation, splitting/merging, conversion to images, and form handling.
    10
    MIT

  • PDF MCP Server

    volume19
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables processing and analysis of large PDF files through text extraction, search functionality, and intelligent chunking strategies. Provides comprehensive PDF operations including metadata retrieval, page-range text extraction, and content search with contextual results.
    -

  • PDF Tools MCP Server

    h-ucchi
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables PDF file manipulation including merging, splitting, extracting pages, extracting text, excluding pages, and reordering pages.
    25 npm
    1
    MIT

  • Nutrient Document Engine MCP

    PSPDFKit
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents and users to process documents through natural language, supporting PDF operations like text extraction, redaction, splitting, form filling, annotations, and content search.
    43 npm
    62
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

B3.3/5.0

Scored across 16 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific PDF manipulation operations, with no ambiguity or overlap between them. The descriptions clearly differentiate actions like adding annotations vs. adding form fields vs. cropping vs. merging, making tool selection straightforward.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent 'pdf_verb_noun' pattern throughout, with clear, descriptive names that use snake_case uniformly. The naming convention is predictable and readable across all 16 tools, with no deviations in style or structure.

Tool Count4/5

16 tools is slightly high but reasonable for a comprehensive PDF manipulation server, covering a wide range of operations from basic editing to advanced features. While it might feel heavy, each tool appears to earn its place for the domain's scope, with no obvious redundancy.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides complete coverage for PDF manipulation, including CRUD-like operations (add, delete, merge, split), metadata handling, form filling, text/image manipulation, and page transformations. There are no apparent gaps that would hinder agents from performing common PDF tasks.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources