Skip to main content
Glama
anboyu-alt

dart-risk-mcp

by anboyu-alt
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to dart-risk-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • kreports

      capitalparser
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables investors and analysts to query Korean listed companies' financial health, accounting risks, and disclosure events using DART filings, accessible via natural language through Claude.
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • Korean DART MCP

      YvesNomura
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search Korean DART corporate disclosures, financial statements, ownership filings, and fully parsed XBRL, while converting HWP/PDF attachments into markdown. It also provides analyst-style frames such as insider trading signals, accounting-risk scoring, and Buffett-style quality checklists for comparing companies.
      1,087 npm
      MIT

    • Korean DART MCP

      MichelMitsotakis
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query Korea's OpenDART disclosure system, covering filings, financials, ownership, and XBRL with Buffett-style quality checklists, insider signals, and accounting risk scoring, plus conversion of HWP/PDF attachments into markdown for direct analysis.
      1,087 npm
      MIT

    • Korean DART MCP

      Simone4741
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and analyze Korean OpenDART electronic disclosures, financial statements, equity filings, and XBRL data through a compressed set of enum-based tools, including insider-trading cluster signals, 0-100 accounting risk scoring, and Buffett-style quality checklists. It also converts DART XML and HWP/PDF report attachments into readable markdown for direct document analysis.
      1,087 npm
      MIT

    • Korean DART MCP

      Virginie00
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search Korean DART electronic disclosures, retrieve financial statements and fully parsed XBRL with calculation checks, and run analyst-style frames such as insider buy/sell cluster signals, 0-100 accounting risk scoring, and Buffett quality checklists. It also converts HWP/PDF filing attachments into markdown for direct reading and summarization.
      1,087 npm
      MIT

    • Korean DART MCP

      diaz6212
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query Korean OpenDART electronic disclosure data — disclosures, financials, equity, and XBRL — through 15 consolidated tools, including insider-trading signals, accounting-risk scoring, Buffett-style quality checklists, and HWP/PDF attachment-to-Markdown conversion.
      1,087 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools carve out distinct scopes and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference neighbours (get_financial_summary vs get_financial_statements_full vs compare_financials; get_audit_opinion_history vs get_audit_opinion_text; get_disclosure_document vs list_disclosure_sections vs view_disclosure). The risk cluster is the soft spot: analyze_company_risk, check_disclosure_anomaly, build_event_timeline and find_risk_precedents all produce 'risk signal' output, and an agent could plausibly pick the wrong one for a given question. get_shareholder_info vs track_insider_trading also overlap on ownership data (snapshot vs time series).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 35 names are snake_case verb_noun (find_, get_, check_, list_, view_, search_, track_, scan_, build_, lookup_, manage_, compare_). Verb variety (track_/scan_/build_) tracks meaningful differences in behavior rather than ad-hoc style drift, and no camelCase or bare-noun names appear.

    Tool Count2/5

    35 tools is well past the heavy threshold, and several clusters could be consolidated (three disclosure-reading tools, four financial-statement tools, four risk/scoring-style tools, two audit tools). The domain breadth is genuine — disclosures, financials, capital events, audit, market scan, watchlist — but the count forces agents to search a long list and increases selection error.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is unusually deep for the stated purpose: CRUD-ish disclosure retrieval, financials at multiple granularities, capital structure and mezzanine terms, audit history plus quoted text, ownership/insider data, market-wide scanning, market reaction, and unlisted-company financials. Remaining gaps are modest: no free-text disclosure-title search across a company (only presets and singled-out report_name), no consolidated group/ownership-graph view, and find_risk_precedents exposes a lookback_days arg that is documented as unused.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources