Skip to main content
Glama
anboyu-alt

dart-risk-mcp

by anboyu-alt

Related Servers

Alternatives to dart-risk-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables investors and analysts to query Korean listed companies' financial health, accounting risks, and disclosure events using DART filings, accessible via natural language through Claude.
      3
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to analyze Korean financial disclosures (DART) with insider trading signals, accounting risk scores, Buffett-style quality checklists, and automatic conversion of HWP/PDF attachments to markdown.
      15
      391 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered analysis of Korean stock market data and corporate disclosures using official DART and KRX APIs.
      132 npm
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access Korea's DART financial data system for retrieving and analyzing corporate disclosures and financial information through natural language queries.
      401 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides natural language access to South Korean corporate disclosure data, financial statements, and shareholder information through the DART Open API. It enables users to query 83 different tools for real-time reporting and regulatory filings from Korean listed companies.
      83
      33 PyPI
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with real-time access to Korean listed companies' disclosures, financial statements, and corporate information via the DART API.
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 34 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct data domains and the descriptions are unusually explicit about boundaries. However, several close pairs exist (get_disclosure_document vs view_disclosure, get_financial_summary vs get_financial_statements_full, check_disclosure_risk vs check_disclosure_anomaly), so an agent could easily misroute a retrieval.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern, with check_/track_/get_/list_/find_ verbs mapping sensibly to actions. Minor inconsistencies remain, such as get_disclosure_document vs view_disclosure both reading document content, and prepositional names like list_disclosures_by_stock and search_notes_in_report.

    Tool Count2/5

    34 tools is firmly in the 'too many' range for a single MCP. Document reading is split across three tools, financial statements across three tools, and audit opinions across two tools, creating fragmentation that could be consolidated without losing functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the full investigative loop: disclosure discovery, document inspection, financial/audit/ownership data, risk signals, actor overlap, watchlists, and market context. The main gap is that market-wide discovery is limited to fixed presets rather than arbitrary keyword search across all filings.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues