dart-risk-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to dart-risk-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables investors and analysts to query Korean listed companies' financial health, accounting risks, and disclosure events using DART filings, accessible via natural language through Claude.3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to analyze Korean financial disclosures (DART) with insider trading signals, accounting risk scores, Buffett-style quality checklists, and automatic conversion of HWP/PDF attachments to markdown.15189 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered analysis of Korean stock market data and corporate disclosures using official DART and KRX APIs.149 npmISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access Korea's DART financial data system for retrieving and analyzing corporate disclosures and financial information through natural language queries.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides natural language access to South Korean corporate disclosure data, financial statements, and shareholder information through the DART Open API. It enables users to query 83 different tools for real-time reporting and regulatory filings from Korean listed companies.833MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with real-time access to Korean listed companies' disclosures, financial statements, and corporate information via the DART API.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 33 tools
The toolset covers a wide range of DART-related analyses; many tools target distinct resources (disclosures, financials, actors, capital events), but several pairs like get_audit_opinion_history vs get_audit_opinion_text, or get_financial_summary vs get_financial_statements_full are borderline and require careful reading of descriptions to distinguish. There is also potential confusion between analyze_company_risk, check_disclosure_anomaly, build_event_timeline, and find_risk_precedents, though descriptions clarify the differences.
Most tools follow a verb_noun or noun_verb pattern (e.g., find_actor_overlap, track_capital_structure, get_financial_summary), but some use only nouns (manage_watchlist is an action-noun mix, list_disclosures_by_stock is noun_verb). There are also inconsistencies like search_notes_in_report vs search_market_disclosures. The naming is generally readable but not fully systematic.
With 33 tools, this server is on the heavy side and contains many overlapping or niche functions that could be consolidated or grouped. For a risk analysis toolkit, this volume increases selection complexity and cognitive load.
The toolset covers a broad spectrum of DART-based risk analysis: financials, disclosures, actors, capital events, audit opinions, market scanning. However, some potential gaps exist: no direct tool for searching actors by name (explicitly noted as impossible), and the watchlist management is limited. Still, it provides comprehensive coverage for its domain.