Skip to main content
Glama
amirjahfar1

Google Search Console (GSC) MCP

by amirjahfar1

batch_url_inspection

Inspect multiple URLs in batch to check indexing status and performance data within Google Search Console API limits.

Instructions

Inspect multiple URLs in batch (within API limits).

Args:
    site_url: Exact GSC property URL from list_properties (e.g. "https://example.com/" or
              "sc-domain:example.com"). Domain properties cover all subdomains — use the
              domain property as site_url and filter by page to analyze a specific subdomain.
    urls: List of URLs to inspect, one per line

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlsYes
site_urlYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present, so description carries full burden. Only mentions API limits; does not disclose error behavior, idempotency, or output format beyond what schema provides.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences plus clear parameter descriptions. No redundant information; front-loaded with main purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers parameters well and mentions API limits. Does not specify batch size or error handling, but output schema likely covers return format. Minor gap for full completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but description adds detailed semantics: site_url includes examples and domain property usage, urls specifies 'one per line'. Compensates fully for missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Inspect multiple URLs in batch (within API limits)', clearly identifying the verb, resource, and scope. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'inspect_url_enhanced' which is likely single-URL.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides guidance on using site_url (domain vs subdomain) and mentions API limits, but lacks explicit comparison to siblings or when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/amirjahfar1/Google-Search-Console-GSC-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server