Expense Tracker MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {
"tasks": {
"list": {},
"cancel": {},
"requests": {
"tools": {
"call": {}
},
"prompts": {
"get": {}
},
"resources": {
"read": {}
}
}
}
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| add_expenseA | Add a new expense entry to the database. If date is not provided, it defaults to current IST date. |
| list_expensesA | List all expenses between start_date and end_date. |
| summarizeA | Summarize all expenses by category within an inclusive date range. If category is not provided, summarize all categories. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| categories |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: adding, listing, and summarizing expenses. No overlap or ambiguity between them.
Two tools follow a verb_noun pattern (add_expense, list_expenses), but summarize is a bare verb, creating a minor inconsistency. Overall still readable and predictable.
Three tools is slightly minimal for an expense tracker, but it covers the core needs. Not excessively thin or bloated.
The set covers adding, listing, and summarizing expenses, but lacks update/delete operations. Users cannot correct or remove entries, a notable gap in lifecycle coverage.