Skip to main content
Glama
ameympatil

Expense Tracker MCP Server

by ameympatil

Related Servers

Alternatives to Expense Tracker MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local Model Context Protocol server for personal expense tracking, enabling users to add, list, summarize, edit, and delete expenses as well as manage credit, with all balance-changing operations handled via SQLite transactions.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing personal expenses, enabling users to add, list, and summarize expenses by category, with data stored in a local SQLite database.
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for tracking expenses with local SQLite storage. Provides tools to add, list, and summarize expenses by category.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight server built with FastMCP and SQLite for managing personal finances. It allows users to add, list, and summarize expenses by category through MCP-compatible clients.
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A powerful SQLite-backed expense tracking server built with the Model Context Protocol (MCP). This server allows AI agents (like Claude) to manage your personal finances by adding, deleting, and listing expenses directly from your chat interface.
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A lightweight local MCP server for tracking personal or small-team expenses. It lets you add expense entries, list transactions within a date range, and generate simple summaries by category — all backed by a local SQLite database.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: adding, listing, and summarizing expenses. No overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Two tools follow a verb_noun pattern (add_expense, list_expenses), but summarize is a bare verb, creating a minor inconsistency. Overall still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is slightly minimal for an expense tracker, but it covers the core needs. Not excessively thin or bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers adding, listing, and summarizing expenses, but lacks update/delete operations. Users cannot correct or remove entries, a notable gap in lifecycle coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues