Skip to main content
Glama
ameeralns

DeepResearch MCP

by ameeralns
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to DeepResearch MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Deep Research MCP Server

      teelaitila
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables iterative deep research by integrating AI agents with search engines, web scraping, and large language models for efficient data gathering and comprehensive reporting.
      11 npm
      324
      MIT

    • OpenDeepSearch

      tositon
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A research tool that performs comprehensive, in-depth research on complex topics by combining sequential thinking with Brave Search capabilities to provide detailed, well-sourced reports.
      11 npm
      3
      MIT

    • Deep Research MCP Server

      hfredrick69
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered iterative research using Google Gemini 2.5 Flash with Google Search Grounding, conducting deep dives with configurable depth and breadth to generate comprehensive, professionally structured research reports.
      3 npm
      MIT

    • Gemini DeepSearch MCP

      alexcong
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An automated research agent that leverages Google Gemini models and Google Search to perform deep, multi-step web research, generating sophisticated queries and producing citation-rich answers.
      1
      28
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    D1.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The tools have overlapping purposes with unclear boundaries, as 'complete-research', 'execute-research-step', and 'initialize-research' all seem to relate to conducting research without clear distinctions. The lack of descriptions exacerbates ambiguity, making it difficult to differentiate their specific roles in a research workflow.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb-noun pattern with hyphens (e.g., 'complete-research', 'execute-research-step'), showing a predictable and readable naming convention throughout the set. There are no deviations or mixed styles, making the naming highly consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 4 tools, the count is borderline for a research domain, as it feels thin for covering a complete research lifecycle (e.g., data analysis, validation, collaboration). While it might handle basic steps, the limited number suggests potential gaps in functionality for a comprehensive research process.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set shows significant gaps for a research domain, as it lacks operations for data gathering, analysis, validation, or collaboration (e.g., no tools for searching sources, analyzing data, or peer review). The surface is incomplete, likely causing agent failures in conducting thorough research without workarounds.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources