shutdown_device
Shut down a specific iOS simulator device by providing its unique identifier (UDID).
Instructions
Shutdown simulator device
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| udid | Yes | Device unique identifier |
Shut down a specific iOS simulator device by providing its unique identifier (UDID).
Shutdown simulator device
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| udid | Yes | Device unique identifier |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description alone must convey behavioral traits. It only states the action without disclosing side effects, prerequisites (e.g., device must be booted), or whether the operation is synchronous.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no extraneous words. It efficiently conveys the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple shutdown action with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks details on behavior (e.g., if it waits for shutdown completion) which would improve completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the sole parameter 'udid' has a clear description. The tool description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Shutdown' and resource 'simulator device', clearly indicating the action and target. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like 'boot_device' and 'delete_device'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage context is provided. The description does not state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., terminating an app) nor when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ambar/simctl-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server