exports_list
List export jobs for a model to track their status and history.
Instructions
List export jobs for a model.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | Yes | ||
| project | No |
List export jobs for a model to track their status and history.
List export jobs for a model.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | Yes | ||
| project | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description only states 'list', implying read-only, but gives no details on return format, authentication requirements, or other behavioral traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single sentence, but lacks necessary detail. Acceptable for simplicity but could be expanded slightly for clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With 2 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient for an agent to fully understand the tool's behavior and return value.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage. The description does not explain what 'model' and 'project' parameters mean beyond their names, adding no semantic value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List export jobs for a model' clearly states the action (list) and the resource (export jobs), distinguishing it from siblings like exports_create and exports_status.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like export_status or models_get. Lacks context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/amanharshx/ultralytics-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server