datasets_delete
Soft-delete a dataset using its ID, slug, username/slug, or dataset URI.
Instructions
Soft-delete a dataset by id, slug, username/slug, or dataset ul:// URI.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| dataset | Yes |
Soft-delete a dataset using its ID, slug, username/slug, or dataset URI.
Soft-delete a dataset by id, slug, username/slug, or dataset ul:// URI.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| dataset | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The term 'soft-delete' implies non-permanent deletion, but no details about recoverability, idempotency, error handling, or consequences. With no annotations provided, the description should disclose more behavioral traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, well-structured sentence with no redundant words. It effectively communicates the core action and accepted inputs.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple deletion tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate but could be improved by clarifying what 'soft-delete' entails or any side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds significant value to the single parameter 'dataset' by explaining it accepts multiple identifier types (id, slug, username/slug, URI). This goes beyond the schema's minimal definition of just 'type: string'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool 'soft-deletes a dataset' and specifies multiple identifier formats (id, slug, username/slug, URI). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like datasets_create or datasets_get which perform different operations.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no mention of when not to use it. The description lacks explicit usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/amanharshx/ultralytics-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server