set_track_mute

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the basic action. Since there are no annotations, the burden falls on the description, but it offers no details about side effects, permissions, or return values. The mute parameter type implies explicit set behavior, but this is inferred by the agent rather than stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with only six words, front-loading the essential action. However, it is too minimal to be fully effective; while every word earns its place, the brevity sacrifices necessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 required boolean parameters) and the existence of an output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not mention what the tool returns, any prerequisites (e.g., track existence), or edge cases. The description falls short of providing a complete overview for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must compensate by explaining parameters, but it does not mention track_index or mute at all. While parameter names are somewhat self-explanatory, the description adds no semantic value beyond the schema itself, which is inadequate given the low coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Mute or unmute a track' clearly states the action (mute/unmute) and the resource (track), making the tool's purpose unambiguous. It is distinct from sibling tools like set_track_volume or set_track_solo but does not explicitly differentiate itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like set_track_solo or set_track_volume, nor are any preconditions or exclusions mentioned. The description lacks context for appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.