delete_arrangement_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates a destructive action (delete) but provides no further behavioral details such as side effects, reversibility, permissions, or error conditions. Without annotations, the description carries the full burden and is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences: the first states the action, the second gives a practical usage hint. No unnecessary words, front-loaded with the primary purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete tool with an output schema, the description covers the core action and a key prerequisite. However, it lacks information on what the return value is, error handling, or any preconditions, making it moderately complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It only indirectly explains clip_index by referencing get_arrangement_clips. Track_index is not explained at all, leaving the agent to infer its meaning from the name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Delete a clip from the arrangement timeline', which specifies the verb (delete), resource (clip), and scope (arrangement timeline). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like delete_clip (which deletes session clips) and delete_track.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a usage hint: 'Use get_arrangement_clips to find the clip_index'. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like delete_clip or delete_track, nor does it mention prerequisites or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.