props_get
Retrieve details of a specific prop by providing its ID. Accesses prop information from the ProPresenter API.
Instructions
Get details of a specific prop
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the prop |
Retrieve details of a specific prop by providing its ID. Accesses prop information from the ProPresenter API.
Get details of a specific prop
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the prop |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It does not mention that the operation is read-only, what happens if the ID is invalid, or any other behavioral characteristics.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (5 words) and front-loads the action, but it could be expanded slightly without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema or annotations, the description is minimally adequate but lacks behavioral context and usage guidance.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with the parameter 'id' described as 'The ID of the prop'. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (get details) and resource (specific prop), distinguishing it from siblings like props_get_all and props_get_thumbnail.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like props_get_all or props_get_thumbnail, leaving the agent to infer usage without explicit context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/alxpark/propresenter-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server