macros_get
Retrieve detailed information about a specific ProPresenter macro using its ID, name, or index.
Instructions
Get details of a specific macro
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the macro (UUID, name, or index) |
Retrieve detailed information about a specific ProPresenter macro using its ID, name, or index.
Get details of a specific macro
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The ID of the macro (UUID, name, or index) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It conveys that this is a read operation ('Get details'), but it does not disclose any additional behavioral traits like permissions, side effects, or return structure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence of six words efficiently conveys the tool's purpose with no unnecessary information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple retrieval tool with one parameter fully described in the schema, the description is largely sufficient. However, it lacks an explicit statement about the return structure, which would be helpful.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a descriptive schema for the 'id' parameter. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'details of a specific macro', distinguishing it from siblings like macros_get_all (list all) and macros_trigger (execute a macro).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as macros_get_all or macros_trigger. The context is implied but not explicitly stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/alxpark/propresenter-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server