fluig_dataset_save

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must cover behavior. It discloses the Rhino/ES5 constraint and server-side execution, which is useful. However, it lacks details on destructive nature (overwrite behavior), required permissions, error states, or return value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with a clear front-loaded purpose statement. Every sentence adds value, but the structure could include a note on behavior like 'Overwrites existing dataset with same ID'.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema provided, but description does not explain return values or success indicators. For a tool executing arbitrary code, error handling and output format are omitted, making it incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description reiterates the ES5 constraint already in the schema, adding no new parameter meaning. It does not explain relationships or defaults.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the specific action 'Create or update' on a 'CUSTOM dataset'. This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like fluig_dataset_list or fluig_dataset_delete, providing a precise verb and resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not specify prerequisites, exclusions, or mention sibling tools like fluig_dataset_list for read-only operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.