Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
JEV_DEBUGNoSet to "1" (default) to log request traces to stderr.1
TYPESAFE_API_KEYYesYour API key from the TypeSafe AI Console (https://console.typesafe.ai/keys).
TYPESAFE_BASE_URLNoCustom API endpoint (default: https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone).https://api.typesafe.ai/v1/systemone

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
jev_evaluateA

Primary proxy router for TypeSafe AI Jev. Evaluates unstructured or structured state against multiple typed questions (noul, choice, score) in parallel. Returns answers with calibrated probabilities, confidence scores, and token usage.

jev_choiceC

Route a single Choice question to Jev. Categorizes or selects one option from a defined rubric, returning the selected choice, confidence score, and full probability distribution.

jev_noulB

Route a single Noul (yes/no) question to Jev. Returns the calibrated probability (0.0 to 1.0) that the answer is yes, suitable for confidence gating and binary routing.

jev_scoreB

Route a single Score question to Jev. Rates the input along an ordered rubric of at least two descriptive levels, returning a weighted score and confidence.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation4/5

jev_evaluate is clearly the multi-question router, while jev_choice, jev_noul, and jev_score each target a distinct question type. There is minor potential overlap because a single question could be sent through either jev_evaluate or the specific single-type tool, but the descriptions make the intended use clear.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools share the consistent jev_ prefix and lowercase snake_case style, which makes them recognizable as a family. However, jev_evaluate uses a verb while jev_choice, jev_noul, and jev_score use noun-like type names, so the action pattern is not perfectly uniform.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is a well-scoped surface for this proxy: one aggregate router plus one tool for each supported question type. There is no redundancy or unnecessary bloat.

Completeness5/5

The tool set fully covers the apparent domain: the three question types (noul, choice, score) are each directly accessible, and jev_evaluate provides the multi-question parallel path. No obvious missing lifecycle or operational tools are needed for a stateless evaluation service.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues