No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 4 tools
jev_evaluate is clearly the multi-question router, while jev_choice, jev_noul, and jev_score each target a distinct question type. There is minor potential overlap because a single question could be sent through either jev_evaluate or the specific single-type tool, but the descriptions make the intended use clear.
All tools share the consistent jev_ prefix and lowercase snake_case style, which makes them recognizable as a family. However, jev_evaluate uses a verb while jev_choice, jev_noul, and jev_score use noun-like type names, so the action pattern is not perfectly uniform.
Four tools is a well-scoped surface for this proxy: one aggregate router plus one tool for each supported question type. There is no redundancy or unnecessary bloat.
The tool set fully covers the apparent domain: the three question types (noul, choice, score) are each directly accessible, and jev_evaluate provides the multi-question parallel path. No obvious missing lifecycle or operational tools are needed for a stateless evaluation service.