Skip to main content
Glama
altirs

@altirs/mcp-server

by altirs

Related Servers

Alternatives to @altirs/mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI agents to scan code for leaked secrets, copyleft licenses, unprotected routes, missing privacy policies, and risky card handling before committing or shipping.
      33 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables transparent security for any MCP server by intercepting tool calls, blocking prompt injection attempts, masking PII in responses, and writing immutable audit logs.
      85 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables scanning of AI agent code for security vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration, directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code.
      2
      LGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables secure interoperability between LLM agents and MCP tool servers by sanitizing requests and responses, masking sensitive tokens, detecting PII, and performing server reputation scans.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    check_content is a composite that overlaps with detect_pii, scan_injection, and check_safety, but its description clearly positions it as the default all-in-one gate, while the individual tools are for targeted use. check_hallucination is distinct because it requires source context.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (check_content, detect_pii, scan_injection, check_safety, check_hallucination). scan_injection deviates slightly from the check_* prefix used by the other three check tools, but the pattern is still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a well-scoped set for a content-safety server. Each tool covers a distinct safety engine, with check_content serving as the umbrella entry point and the others providing focused checks.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the main guardrail categories: safety, PII, injection, and hallucination. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated tool for updating or managing guardrail configurations, but the core detection surface is complete for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues