@altirs/mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to @altirs/mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides prompt injection detection, PII/secrets redaction, and an audit trail for AI agents via MCP tools.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI agents to scan code for leaked secrets, copyleft licenses, unprotected routes, missing privacy policies, and risky card handling before committing or shipping.33 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceRuntime safety guardrails for AI coding agents. Checks file access, validates shell commands, and scores your repo's AI safety — all via MCP.4 npm8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables transparent security for any MCP server by intercepting tool calls, blocking prompt injection attempts, masking PII in responses, and writing immutable audit logs.85 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables scanning of AI agent code for security vulnerabilities such as prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration, directly from MCP-compatible clients like Claude Code.2LGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables secure interoperability between LLM agents and MCP tool servers by sanitizing requests and responses, masking sensitive tokens, detecting PII, and performing server reputation scans.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
check_content is a composite that overlaps with detect_pii, scan_injection, and check_safety, but its description clearly positions it as the default all-in-one gate, while the individual tools are for targeted use. check_hallucination is distinct because it requires source context.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (check_content, detect_pii, scan_injection, check_safety, check_hallucination). scan_injection deviates slightly from the check_* prefix used by the other three check tools, but the pattern is still readable and predictable.
Five tools is a well-scoped set for a content-safety server. Each tool covers a distinct safety engine, with check_content serving as the umbrella entry point and the others providing focused checks.
The server covers the main guardrail categories: safety, PII, injection, and hallucination. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated tool for updating or managing guardrail configurations, but the core detection surface is complete for its stated purpose.