@allchemylabs/aether-wcag-scanner
OfficialServer Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLCHEMY_API_KEY | No | Your Allchemy Labs API key. Optional; without it the scanner still works but returns template-based fixes instead of corpus-grounded ones. |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| aether_scan_and_fixA | Scan a URL (or a multi-route SPA via the |
| aether_get_fixA | Get a RAG-powered fix OR explanation for a WCAG violation. Pass |
| aether_check_htmlA | Analyze an HTML snippet for WCAG accessibility issues without needing a live URL or browser. Uses static heuristic checks and optionally enriches results with RAG-powered fixes. Use this when a developer pastes HTML or asks about a component's accessibility. |
| aether_verify_fixA | Deterministically verify a WCAG fix with the real Playwright + axe-core engine. URL mode re-scans a live page; snippet mode diffs original vs fixed HTML before deploy. Returns MEASURED facts: targetCleared, newViolations (regressions), resolvedViolations, and complianceDelta. This is the authoritative "did the fix work?" signal. |
| aether_submit_feedbackA | Submit developer feedback on a previously returned WCAG fix/artifact, keyed by its finding_id. Records a rating plus an optional reason_code and the code the developer actually shipped, so the fix pipeline can learn from misses. Requires ALLCHEMY_API_KEY. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool addresses a distinct phase of the accessibility workflow: analyzing static HTML, scanning/fixing a URL, retrieving fixes/explanations, verifying fixes, and submitting feedback. There is no overlap or ambiguity between their purposes.
All tools share the 'aether_' prefix and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (check_html, get_fix, verify_fix, submit_feedback). The exception is 'scan_and_fix', which uses a compound verb phrase, but this is still clear and consistent in style.
With 5 tools, the server covers the full lifecycle of accessibility auditing and remediation without bloat. Each tool is necessary and earns its place, making the count well-scoped for the domain.
The tool surface covers analysis, scanning with optional fixes, retrieval of detailed fix guidance, verification of applied fixes, and feedback collection. There are no obvious missing operations for the intended workflow.