@allchemylabs/aether-wcag-scanner
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to @allchemylabs/aether-wcag-scanner
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAutonomous WCAG 2.1 accessibility auditor that scans, fixes, re-verifies, and generates VPAT 2.5 EN 301 549 reports using AI vision analysis + DOM scanning.5,887 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables automated web accessibility scanning and browser automation, allowing WCAG compliance checks, page interaction, persistent browser sessions, and detailed accessibility reports with visual annotations.2,020 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables accessibility testing of websites and HTML content using axe-core and IBM Equal Access engines. Supports WCAG compliance checking, multi-viewport testing, and provides detailed violation reports with remediation guidance.51-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI-driven UI inspection and optimization by scanning websites with configurable viewports, capturing screenshots, running deterministic accessibility and layout checks, and generating prioritized reports with fix prompts.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform conversational accessibility testing with actionable insights, code-level fixes, and support for authenticated sessions and batch audits.223 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides conversational, actionable accessibility testing for AI agents, including auditing, prioritization, and code-level fixes.222 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool addresses a distinct phase of the accessibility workflow: analyzing static HTML, scanning/fixing a URL, retrieving fixes/explanations, verifying fixes, and submitting feedback. There is no overlap or ambiguity between their purposes.
All tools share the 'aether_' prefix and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (check_html, get_fix, verify_fix, submit_feedback). The exception is 'scan_and_fix', which uses a compound verb phrase, but this is still clear and consistent in style.
With 5 tools, the server covers the full lifecycle of accessibility auditing and remediation without bloat. Each tool is necessary and earns its place, making the count well-scoped for the domain.
The tool surface covers analysis, scanning with optional fixes, retrieval of detailed fix guidance, verification of applied fixes, and feedback collection. There are no obvious missing operations for the intended workflow.