Fetch device firmware upgrade logs to review update history and troubleshoot failed upgrades on Omada networks.
Get firmware upgrade logs showing the history of upgrade operations performed on devices.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Start page number. Start from 1. | |
| pageSize | No | Number of entries per page. Range: 1-1000. | |
| customHeaders | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.15.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, scope (all devices vs. specific), or pagination behavior beyond schema defaults.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 14 words, front-loaded verb, no redundant information. Every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Covers basic purpose but misses scope (all devices or filtered?), output format, and prerequisites. Adequate for a simple tool but insufficient given missing annotations and sibling context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 67% (page and pageSize documented, customHeaders undocumented). The description adds no additional meaning for any parameter, so it meets baseline but does not compensate for the undocumented customHeaders.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states it retrieves firmware upgrade logs, which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from upgrade-related siblings like getFirmwareInfo or getFirmwareUpgradePlan by focusing on logs of past operations.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. With many upgrade-related siblings, the description lacks context on prerequisites or scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.