getSwitchStackDetail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, placing full burden on the description. It only states the tool fetches information but fails to disclose idempotency, required permissions, error scenarios, or return format (e.g., single object vs. array). Essential behavioral traits are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise—a single sentence that directly states the tool's purpose. It is well front-loaded and contains no extraneous information. Every word is earned.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema, the description does not explain what 'detailed information' entails (e.g., JSON structure, fields). The tool involves a nested object parameter (customHeaders), but no behavioral context is provided. The description is incomplete for a tool of this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 67% schema coverage (siteId and customHeaders described), the description adds no parameter context. It omits explaining the required stackId (e.g., its origin from listSitesStacks) and does not clarify the role of optional parameters beyond the schema. No value added over the input schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Fetch') and resource ('detailed information for a specific switch stack'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like getSwitchDetail (for switches) and listSitesStacks (lists all stacks). However, 'detailed information' is somewhat vague; mentioning specific attributes like configuration or status would improve clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as getStackNetworkList or getStackPorts. The description does not mention prerequisites, siteId handling, or the appropriate context for invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.