Skip to main content
Glama
aliyun

AlibabaCloud DevOps MCP Server

Official
by aliyun

update_change_request_comment

Update the content or resolved status of a comment on a change request to keep discussions accurate and track issue resolution.

Instructions

[Code Management] Update a comment on a change request. Can update the comment content and/or resolved status.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
organizationIdYes组织ID,可在组织管理后台的基本信息页面获取。示例:'60d54f3daccf2bbd6659f3ad'
repositoryIdYes代码库ID或者URL-Encoder编码的全路径。示例:'2835387' 或 '60de7a6852743a5162b5f957%2FDemoRepo'(注意:斜杠需要URL编码为%2F)
localIdYes合并请求局部ID,表示代码库中第几个合并请求。示例:'1' 或 '42'
commentBizIdYes评论 bizId,具有唯一性,用于标识要更新的评论。示例:'bf117304dfe44d5d9b1132f348edf92e'
contentNo评论内容,更新后的评论内容(可选)。如果提供,将更新评论的文本内容。示例:'your new comment' 或 '更新后的评论内容:这里需要优化性能,建议使用缓存机制'
resolvedNo是否已解决(可选)。true - 标记为已解决;false - 标记为未解决。示例:false。如果不提供此参数,将保持原有的解决状态不变
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and description does not disclose behavioral traits like side effects, idempotency, or what happens to the comment (e.g., partial update, response). Minimal beyond stating updatable fields.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence with category prefix, to the point. Could be slightly more structured but no waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters and no output schema, the description lacks information about response, permissions, or any behavioral context. Incomplete for a mutation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so description adds no new meaning beyond what schema provides. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it updates a comment on a change request, specifying updatable fields (content and resolved status). Distinguishes from sibling create and list tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Purpose is clear enough for when to use (to update a comment), but lacks explicit when-not or alternative tools. No mention of prerequisites or context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/aliyun/alibabacloud-devops-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server