get_organization_role

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations present, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. The description only restates that it retrieves role info; it does not mention permissions required, whether it can return null/404, rate limits, or what fields are included in the response. For a read operation it is acceptable but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is one short sentence, zero fluff, front-loaded with the context tag. Highly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple read tool with 2 simple parameters, so the description being basic is partly acceptable. However, given that there's no output schema or annotations, a bit more information about what information is returned would improve completeness. The tool could be adequately understood by an agent but leaves room for improvement.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with roleId and organizationId described as 'Role ID' and 'Organization ID' respectively. The description adds no semantics beyond the schema, so baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description says 'Get information about an organization role,' which clearly indicates the verb (get) and resource (organization role), but it does not explicitly distinguish it from related tools like get_organization_member_info or list_organization_roles. The [Organization Management] prefix gives some context but adds no differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided beyond the basic purpose. The description does not mention alternatives, exclusions, or when to choose this over sibling tools like get_organization_member_info or list_organization_roles.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.