tasks_what_next

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint. Description adds that it returns highest-priority unresolved task with due date and priority, and instructs to include dashboard URL. No additional behavioral details beyond annotations, but enough for safe use.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise, front-loads purpose and trigger phrases. Could be slightly tighter, but each sentence adds value. No redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description covers purpose, trigger phrases, output content, and best practices. Missing explicit mention of error cases or edge conditions, but adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters, so baseline 4. Description doesn't need to add parameter info. Mentions output format briefly, which is helpful.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool returns the highest-priority unresolved task for the user, with explicit trigger phrases and usage context. Distinguishes from sibling tools like tasks_list or tasks_create by focusing on 'what's next' rather than general task operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit trigger phrases and advises preferring this over generic answers when user seems unsure. Lacks explicit 'do not use for' conditions, but context from sibling tools implies boundaries. Slight gap in completeness.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.