memory_snapshot_list
List all available memory snapshots. Optionally filter by space UUID to narrow results.
Instructions
List all available snapshots
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| space_id | No | Filter by space UUID (optional) |
List all available memory snapshots. Optionally filter by space UUID to narrow results.
List all available snapshots
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| space_id | No | Filter by space UUID (optional) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. Description adds 'all available snapshots' but no additional behavioral context like permissions or response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise at 4 words, no wasted content, front-loaded with the action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With only one optional parameter and no output schema, the minimal description is adequate but doesn't explain what a snapshot is or what information is returned, leaving room for improvement.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'space_id', which is described in the schema as 'Filter by space UUID (optional)'. Description adds no further semantics.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'list' and the resource 'all available snapshots', distinguishing it from siblings like memory_snapshot_create and memory_snapshot_restore.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is provided. The optional space_id parameter implies filtering but no alternatives are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/alfredoizdev/contextforge-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server