ftp-deploy-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ftp-deploy-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn enterprise-grade MCP server for FTP and SFTP operations optimized for AI coding assistants, featuring smart synchronization, connection pooling, and unified diff patching.2823 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for managing remote SSH servers, enabling AI agents to execute commands, transfer files, and perform deployment operations securely.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to perform development operations on remote servers via SSH, including executing commands, managing files, and browsing directories.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents SSH capabilities to execute commands, transfer files, and inspect remote systems through a preconfigured host list.49 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server providing safe, sandboxed SFTP access to game servers for AI agents, enabling config editing, addon installation, and backups without shell access.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server giving AI agents full SSH access with persistent sessions, structured command output, SFTP file transfer, and port forwarding.1841 PyPI10MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools have clear, distinct purposes (list, read, upload, download, mkdir, rename, delete, deploy, list servers, test). The only potential overlap is between ftp_deploy and ftp_upload, but ftp_deploy is for recursive directory uploads while ftp_upload is for a single file, so they are distinguishable with descriptions.
All tool names follow a consistent ftp_ prefix with a verb (deploy, list, test, read, upload, download, mkdir, rename, delete). The pattern is uniform and predictable, making it easy for an agent to infer functionality.
With 10 tools, the set is well-scoped for an FTP deployment server. Each tool covers a distinct operation (connection management, file operations, directory operations, deployment), and the count is within the ideal range of 3-15 tools.
The core FTP operations are covered: list, read, upload, download, mkdir, rename, delete, and deploy. Missing features like file permissions or detailed metadata (e.g., last modified time) are minor gaps, but the CRUD lifecycle is complete for file and directory operations.