Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to e-worker-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local-first open-source MCP server that acts as a personal secretary, memory manager, and automation hub—it syncs Calendar, Gmail, Canvas, GitHub, and Health into a typed temporal memory graph, and enables approval-gated write actions like creating events, drafting/sending mail, and filing issues, all with telegram/slack/CLI interfaces and a SQLite-backed audit trail.
      33
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that enables AI-assisted coding through workspace-scoped tools for file reading/editing, command execution, jobs, Git, LSP, media, browser, and desktop workflows. It enforces OAuth, workspace ACL, trust policies, and file/secret guards so owners can safely grant inspect, edit, or trusted capabilities.
      617 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that records completed tasks to daily JSONL files and promotes substantial work to a cumulative weekly Markdown worklog, providing persistent, searchable logs of AI-assisted productivity.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local-first code intelligence and safety layer for AI coding agents. MCP server exposes dependency graph, impact analysis, and AST-compressed repo context, backed by typed local memory, patch-scope safety gates, and git-independent transaction rollback.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A self-hosted MCP server that provides any LLM with a graph-backed memory layer of your life—tasks, email, finance, contacts, calendar—plus autonomous agent offices that act on your behalf.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: read-only queries, preview dry-runs, and apply mutations are separated with explicit _preview and _apply suffixes. Resource-specific operations (todo, time, file, db, diagnose) are well compartmentalized, leaving no ambiguity between tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a resource_action or resource_action_preview/apply pattern in snake_case (e.g., todo_list, todo_create_apply, db_export). However, a few outliers like safety_policy, report_daily, report_weekly, diagnose_report, and diagnose_collect deviate from the verb_noun convention, making the set slightly inconsistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 25 tools, the server covers multiple domains (todos, time logging, reports, diagnostics, file management, DB import/export), which explains the large count. While each tool serves a purpose, the set feels heavy and may overwhelm agents; it sits at the top of the 'borderline' range for tool count.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core workflows: todo lifecycle (create, update, transition, list, get), time logging, daily/weekly reports, file operations, diagnostics, and DB import/export. Minor gaps exist, such as no update/delete for time logs, no explicit todo delete (though archived status may suffice), and diagnostic suggestions are not executable within the server.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues