remove_notes_from_clip

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It explains parameter behavior such as defaults and the time_span=None fallback, but does not disclose side effects, reversibility, or destructive warnings beyond the verb 'Remove'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A concise one-line summary followed by a structured Args list. Every sentence earns its place, with no wasted words or redundant repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 6 parameters and no annotations, the description provides adequate coverage of the operation and parameters, and an output schema exists so return values need not be explained. It lacks some behavioral caveats like undoability or interaction with existing clip data, but is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description fully compensates by explaining every parameter's meaning, including zero-based index semantics, pitch/time ranges, and special handling of time_span (None uses clip length). This adds significant value beyond the bare schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool removes MIDI notes from a clip within a pitch and time range, specifying the verb and resource. However, it does not distinguish from the sibling tool remove_notes_extended, which likely performs a similar function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The tool's purpose implies when it should be used (removing notes in a range), but there is no explicit guidance on when to use this version versus alternate tools like remove_notes_extended, nor any exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.