get_record_mode

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the return value (record_mode: True if armed, False otherwise) but does not explicitly state that the tool is read-only or has no side effects. With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden, but it provides minimal behavioral context beyond the return type.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and front-loaded with the main purpose. The second sentence adds the return value detail. Every sentence earns its place with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (no params, output schema exists) and the clear description of the boolean return, the description is sufficiently complete. There are no complex behaviors or constraints to document.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so schema coverage is complete. The description does not need to add parameter semantics. A baseline of 4 is appropriate for a no-parameter tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets whether arrangement recording is armed, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from siblings like set_record_mode, which is the setter, and get_session_record_status, which concerns session record status.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when you need to know the armed state of arrangement recording. However, it does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions, such as clarifying that this is for arrangement not session recording, though the name makes that somewhat clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.